The Life of Christian Guy

Yup, this is my life.

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Xanga

Yeah, I've been posting a little bit on Xanga.

Subscriptions are just so convenient! It makes it way easier for me to keep up with my friends' blogs, so maybe they'd like to keep up with mine the same way.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

Quickie

First, thank you to Gloria for pointing out this response by Cathy Gatley to the WSJ article on White Flight at Monta Vista and Lynbrook High Schools. I posted about this article, and made several critical remarks about Gatley's comments.

Second, thanks to Bob, who pointed out that comment moderation was turned on in my BLOG, preventing people's comments from showing up.

Hopefully, I'll have another post coming.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Going Back for the Holiday

Yup, I'm heading home for the holidays, and I wanted to let anybody who's reading this BLOG know. (Though from what I can tell, my readership basically consists of Cliff.)

I'm looking forward to doing Bay Area stuff, eating Bay Area food, and most of all, seeing Bay Area people.

Stuff I want to do (If you're doing any of these, send me an e-mail!):
Play poker
Play basketball
Go shopping at Gilroy

Places I want to eat at:
In 'N Out Burger
Fatima (a Chinese restaurant in Cupertino)
Taqueria de los Amigos (an awesome burrito place in Foster City)
Buca di Beppo?

People I want to see:
You! E-mail me to hang out!

Saturday, December 17, 2005

King Kong Review

I went to go see the new Peter Jackson movie "King Kong" on the strength of 9 positive reviews and 1 mixed review on the Movies.com summary of reviews.

I recommend this movie wholeheartedly; it is, by far, the best movie I've seen this year. It offers not only phenomenal action scenes and unprecedented special effects, but an unexpectedly touching story with genuine emotion.

Peter Jackson's new "King Kong" movie is a remake of the original 1933 picture of the same name. As such, the general outlines of the plot aren't a surprise, even though I've never seen the original.

Since I hate reading spoilers , I'll refrain from summarizing Kong's plot, although many elements of it are well-known. Instead, I'll focus on my experience at the movie, and let any possible reader experience the magic on your own.

The movie started slowly. Peter Jackson's ability to introduce characters and set up an epic movie, so deftly executed in "The Fellowship of the Ring", fails noticeably in "King Kong." Perhaps one element is the like of characters I could relate to. One protagonist, the writer is too sensitive and subtle to be likeable for me. Cheesy music and a thoroughly slimy Jack Black character added to my inability to be drawn into the movie.

During the second and third hour of the movie, the director hits far more true notes. Many of the action scenes are actually exhilirating, and left the audience gasping. After one particularly good fight, people in my movie theater erupted in spontaneous applause, a testament to the level of engagement achieved.

As the movie progresses, it becomes clear that the movie has elements of character development far beyond the standard action movie fare. I don't want to exaggerate, but the movie left more than one tear in the eyes of the audience.

To summarize, I'd definitely recommend watching "King Kong". It's an epic movie, great date fare, and, in my opinion, the best movie of the year.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

On Losing Weight

I read something interesting in the December 1 issue of The Economist about weight loss.

Basically, for most of natural history, animals have had to worry about starvation. Only in recent history have living creatures, that is, people in developed countries, had virtually no fear of starvation.

This explains why it's hard to lose weight by simply cutting calories, and easy to gain weight by increasing calories. The body's biochemistry is designed to decrease metabolism when calorie intake falls, thus avoiding starvation. At the same time, people's appetites expand easily to accomodate what's in front of them. This is because the body tries to store fat during times of plenty.

There's a more technical explanation for this in the article itself, but that's the interesting part to me.

Monday, December 12, 2005

The Weekend that Was

Many thanks to Cliff for the awesome room at the Westin on Times Square that we stayed at. Retail price of the room we stayed at: $499.

A few highlights from the weekend:

  • A five-hour, relatively traffic-free bus ride, punctuated by a showing of "The Terminal". (Rating: 4/10. Catherine Zeta Jones gives a strangely leaden performance in the lead actress role, dampening what could be an inspiring movie about making the best of a bad situation.)
  • Eating dinner with my sister, who happened to be visiting NY for residency interviews.
  • Working out with Cliff, who's apparently more sedentary than the mammoth balls of dust accumulated on my window sills. After a few exercises, I can say that he did *not* fake 5 consecutive wrestling defeats to his 110-pound girlfriend.
  • Lunch at New York Noodletown, an awesome cheap eats Chinese restaurant in Manhattan that I have to visit every time I go. After a meal spanning salt and pepper squid, wonton dumplings with whole shrimp, and an array of delicately prepared dark green Chinese vegetables, the restaurant makes my mouth water just thinking about it.
  • Sake shots with Cliff, Asaf, and Audrey. And yes friends, he is so gone.
  • Beams of pride at the unbelievable thriftiness of LB. In her own words: "if you drink tea, bring a tea bag with you to work, and stop by Starbuck's for a cup of hot water, and free milk, honey, etc." That's a $3 beverage for just 31 cents.
  • Finding out that Yahoo! screwed up and just awarded my fantasy team 2 points last weekend - just enough to give me a 2-0 record against likely fantasy league winner Gideon. More importantly, I'm just one game back of our new current fantasy leader Andrew Kong, with 2 games left to play.

Monday, November 28, 2005

On the WSJ Article

Okay, last week, I published the full text of a WSJ Article on how white students are leaving Monta Vista because of the high fraction of Asian immigrants.

Let me comment on this article, coming from the point of view of someone who attended Monta Vista, albeit back in the early 90's. This is relevant because I'd estimate the white population of the school at more like 50%, instead of the 33% figure cited in the article.

First, the article points out that white students may feel uncomfortable because of the high population of Asian students, and because the school is too competitive. While I think this point has merit, I need to take a moment to rip on one of the article's sources: MVHS Parent Teacher Association (PTA) president Cathy Gatley.

The article says:

"Cathy Gatley, co-president of Monta Vista High School's parent-teacher association, recently dissuaded a family with a young child from moving to Cupertino because there are so few young white kids left in the public schools. 'This may not sound good,' she confides, 'but their child may be the only Caucasian kid in the class.'" Later on in the article, the articulate Ms. Gatley says, "White kids are thought of as the dumb kids."

What is wrong with this woman? One main purpose of the MVHS PTA, according to their website is to "offer support for the many school activities and organizations". Parents should join the PTA to "support the MV community as a dedicated parent."

Does it sound like Ms. Gatley is supporting Monta Vista? Is she meeting her duty as the President of the PTA by encouraging borderline-racist behaviors among parents? Why would any true supporter of a school discourage kids from attending it?

Okay, end of rant.

The article also cites other, more legitimate evidence that white students can feel uncomfortable there. It points out that Monta Vista is too "academically driven", can be too competitive, and can put whites in the position of underachievers.

What can I say about this? Is Monta Vista very academically driven and competitive? Yes. After getting a test back, the first question everyone asks is: "What did Insert Name Here get?" Does it place emphasis on subjects like math and science? Yes again, as quantifiable by the high number of AP courses available in the math and science fields, and the low number in the humanities fields (we didn't have AP economics or AP political science, for example).

Is this bad? I'd argue that this depends on your persuasion as far as the methods of education. Competition, in many cases, can lift the overall quality of education by offering metrics and incentives for students to assess themselves. Also, an early focus on math and science is a broadly valuable preparation for virtually any career. On the other hand, the purpose of schools is to educate the kids, not to put them in a Darwinian struggle to get into top colleges.

So, depending on your bent, competition is good and bad. I'll note that Asian parents aren't cited here as keeping their kids from Monta Vista because of the level of competition.

Do Asian high schools put whites in the positions of underachievers? I'm not sure what to say here. Certainly, there were smart white kids in my class: Anthony Sturzu, Paul Katz, Guy Berger. But the AP classes were definitely mostly Asian, particularly AP chemistry (considered the most prestigious AP class to be during my 4 years there). Also, I didn't take many remedial or lower division classes, so I'd say I'm not qualified on any level to assess whether more whites or Asians underachieve.

I think there's a few points that the article missed: the influence of high incomes on high test results. Certainly, the incomes in Cupertino, which feeds students into Monta Vista, are much higher than national averages. So, even if the students had a more "representative" demographic, performance would still be high along with levels of competition.

In addition, there's a selection issue with Asian students at Monta Vista. Monta Vista has acquired a reputation among Asians for being a top performing school. Many parents who value their kid's educations will move to the Cupertino area for this reason. So I'd argue that parents who value their kid's educations enough to pay purchase expensive housing and pay increased rents will have kids who perform better academically.

One final point (for anybody who's still reading this long, rather rambling post) is a comment on whether Asian students get sheltered at largely Asian high schools.

I think that this is true. It's been a bit of a culture shock to be in D.C., and to feel at times that there are no Asian people around. And to be fair, according to the census, the percentage of Asian people in D.C. (2.7%) is substantially less than than the percentage of Asian people in the U.S. as a whole (3.6%).

But this culture shock might have been lessened if I'd gone to a high school with a smaller Asian population.
Artest

Let's take a vote: Do you think I should get the words "Tru Warier" Shaved in my head like Ron Artest?

Monday, November 21, 2005

Fascinating

I'll try to comment on my thoughts on this when I can...

The New White Flight

In Silicon Valley, two high schools
with outstanding academic reputations
are losing white students
as Asian students move in. Why?
By SUEIN HWANG
November 19, 2005; Page A1

CUPERTINO, Calif. -- By most measures, Monta Vista High here and Lynbrook High, in nearby San Jose, are among the nation's top public high schools. Both boast stellar test scores, an array of advanced-placement classes and a track record of sending graduates from the affluent suburbs of Silicon Valley to prestigious colleges.

But locally, they're also known for something else: white flight. Over the past 10 years, the proportion of white students at Lynbrook has fallen by nearly half, to 25% of the student body. At Monta Vista, white students make up less than one-third of the population, down from 45% -- this in a town that's half white. Some white Cupertino parents are instead sending their children to private schools or moving them to other, whiter public schools. More commonly, young white families in Silicon Valley say they are avoiding Cupertino altogether.


White students are far outnumbered by Asians at Monta Vista High School in Cupertino, Calif.


Whites aren't quitting the schools because the schools are failing academically. Quite the contrary: Many white parents say they're leaving because the schools are too academically driven and too narrowly invested in subjects such as math and science at the expense of liberal arts and extracurriculars like sports and other personal interests.

The two schools, put another way that parents rarely articulate so bluntly, are too Asian.

Cathy Gatley, co-president of Monta Vista High School's parent-teacher association, recently dissuaded a family with a young child from moving to Cupertino because there are so few young white kids left in the public schools. "This may not sound good," she confides, "but their child may be the only Caucasian kid in the class." All of Ms. Gatley's four children have attended or are currently attending Monta Vista. One son, Andrew, 17 years old, took the high-school exit exam last summer and left the school to avoid the academic pressure. He is currently working in a pet-supply store. Ms. Gatley, who is white, says she probably wouldn't have moved to Cupertino if she had anticipated how much it would change.

In the 1960s, the term "white flight" emerged to describe the rapid exodus of whites from big cities into the suburbs, a process that often resulted in the economic degradation of the remaining community. Back then, the phenomenon was mostly believed to be sparked by the growth in the population of African-Americans, and to a lesser degree Hispanics, in some major cities.

But this modern incarnation is different. Across the country, Asian-Americans have by and large been successful and accepted into middle- and upper-class communities. Silicon Valley has kept Cupertino's economy stable, and the town is almost indistinguishable from many of the suburbs around it. The shrinking number of white students hasn't hurt the academic standards of Cupertino's schools -- in fact the opposite is true.

This time the effect is more subtle: Some Asians believe that the resulting lack of diversity creates an atmosphere that is too sheltering for their children, leaving then unprepared for life in a country that is only 4% Asian overall. Moreover, many Asians share some of their white counterpart's concerns. Both groups finger newer Asian immigrants for the schools' intense competitiveness.

Some whites fear that by avoiding schools with large Asian populations parents are short-changing their own children, giving them the idea that they can't compete with Asian kids. "My parents never let me think that because I'm Caucasian, I'm not going to succeed," says Jessie Hogin, a white Monta Vista graduate.

The white exodus clearly involves race-based presumptions, not all of which are positive. One example: Asian parents are too competitive. That sounds like racism to many of Cupertino's Asian residents, who resent the fact that their growing numbers and success are causing many white families to boycott the town altogether.

"It's a stereotype of Asian parents," says Pei-Pei Yow, a Hewlett-Packard Co. manager and Chinese-American community leader who sent two kids to Monta Vista. It's like other familiar biases, she says: "You can't say everybody from the South is a redneck."

Jane Doherty, a retirement-community administrator, chose to send her two boys elsewhere. When her family moved to Cupertino from Indiana over a decade ago, Ms. Doherty says her top priority was moving into a good public-school district. She paid no heed to a real-estate agent who told her of the town's burgeoning Asian population.


She says she began to reconsider after her elder son, Matthew, entered Kennedy, the middle school that feeds Monta Vista. As he played soccer, Ms. Doherty watched a line of cars across the street deposit Asian kids for after-school study. She also attended a Monta Vista parents' night and came away worrying about the school's focus on test scores and the big-name colleges its graduates attend.

"My sense is that at Monta Vista you're competing against the child beside you," she says. Ms. Doherty says she believes the issue stems more from recent immigrants than Asians as a whole. "Obviously, the concentration of Asian students is really high, and it does flavor the school," she says.

When Matthew, now a student at Notre Dame, finished middle school eight years ago, Ms. Doherty decided to send him to Bellarmine College Preparatory, a Jesuit school that she says has a culture that "values the whole child." It's also 55% white and 24% Asian. Her younger son, Kevin, followed suit.

Kevin Doherty, 17, says he's happy his mother made the switch. Many of his old friends at Kennedy aren't happy at Monta Vista, he says. "Kids at Bellarmine have a lot of pressure to do well, too, but they want to learn and do something they want to do."

While California has seen the most pronounced cases of suburban segregation, some of the developments in Cupertino are also starting to surface in other parts of the U.S. At Thomas S. Wootton High School in Rockville, Md., known flippantly to some locals as "Won Ton," roughly 35% of students are of Asian descent. People who don't know the school tend to make assumptions about its academics, says Principal Michael Doran. "Certain stereotypes come to mind -- 'those people are good at math,' " he says.

In Tenafly, N.J., a well-to-do bedroom community near New York, the local high school says it expects Asian students to make up about 36% of its total in the next five years, compared with 27% today. The district still attracts families of all backgrounds, but Asians are particularly intent that their kids work hard and excel, says Anat Eisenberg, a local Coldwell Banker real-estate agent. "Everybody is caught into this process of driving their kids." Lawrence Mayer, Tenafly High's vice principal, says he's never heard such concerns.

Perched on the western end of the Santa Clara valley, Cupertino was for many years a primarily rural area known for its many fruit orchards. The beginnings of the tech industry brought suburbanization, and Cupertino then became a very white, quintessentially middle-class town of mostly modest ranch homes, populated by engineers and their families. Apple Computer Inc. planted its headquarters there.

As the high-tech industry prospered, so did Cupertino. Today, the orchards are a memory, replaced by numerous shopping malls and subdivisions that are home to Silicon Valley's prosperous upper-middle class. While the architecture in Cupertino is largely the same as in neighboring communities, the town of about 50,000 people now boasts Indian restaurants, tutoring centers and Asian grocers. Parents say Cupertino's top schools have become more academically intense over the past 10 years.

Asian immigrants have surged into the town, granting it a reputation -- particularly among recent Chinese and South Asian immigrants -- as a Bay Area locale of choice. Cupertino is now 41% Asian, up from 24% in 1998.


Students in the library at Lynbrook High School


Some students struggle in Cupertino's high schools who might not elsewhere. Monta Vista's Academic Performance Index, which compares the academic performance of California's schools, reached an all-time high of 924 out of 1,000 this year, making it one of the highest-scoring high schools in Northern California. Grades are so high that a 'B' average puts a student in the bottom third of a class.

"We have great students, which has a lot of upsides," says April Scott, Monta Vista's principal. "The downside is what the kids with a 3.0 GPA think of themselves."

Ms. Scott and her counterpart at Lynbrook know what's said about their schools being too competitive and dominated by Asians. "It's easy to buy into those kinds of comments because they're loaded and powerful," says Ms. Scott, who adds that they paint an inaccurate picture of Monta Vista. Ms. Scott says many athletic programs are thriving and points to the school's many extracurricular activities. She also points out that white students represented 20% of the school's 29 National Merit Semifinalists this year.

Judy Hogin, Jessie's mother and a Cupertino real-estate agent, believes the school was good for her daughter, who is now a freshman at the University of California at San Diego. "I know it's frustrating to some people who have moved away," says Ms. Hogin, who is white. Jessie, she says, "rose to the challenge."

On a recent autumn day at Lynbrook, crowds of students spilled out of classrooms for midmorning break. Against a sea of Asian faces, the few white students were easy to pick out. One boy sat on a wall, his lighter hair and skin making him stand out from dozens of others around him. In another corner, four white male students lounged at a picnic table.

At Cupertino's top schools, administrators, parents and students say white students end up in the stereotyped role often applied to other minority groups: the underachievers. In one 9th-grade algebra class, Lynbrook's lowest-level math class, the students are an eclectic mix of whites, Asians and other racial and ethnic groups.

"Take a good look," whispered Steve Rowley, superintendent of the Fremont Union High School District, which covers the city of Cupertino as well as portions of other neighboring cities. "This doesn't look like the other classes we're going to."

On the second floor, in advanced-placement chemistry, only a couple of the 32 students are white and the rest are Asian. Some white parents, and even some students, say they suspect teachers don't take white kids as seriously as Asians.

"Many of my Asian friends were convinced that if you were Asian, you had to confirm you were smart. If you were white, you had to prove it," says Arar Han, a Monta Vista graduate who recently co-edited "Asian American X," a book of coming-of-age essays by young Asian-Americans.

Ms. Gatley, the Monta Vista PTA president, is more blunt: "White kids are thought of as the dumb kids," she says.

Cupertino's administrators and faculty, the majority of whom are white, adamantly say there's no discrimination against whites. The administrators say students of all races get along well. In fact, there's little evidence of any overt racial tension between students or between their parents.

Mr. Rowley, the school superintendent, however, concedes that a perception exists that's sometimes called "the white-boy syndrome." He describes it as: "Kids who are white feel themselves a distinct minority against a majority culture."

Mr. Rowley, who is white, enrolled his only son, Eddie, at Lynbrook. When Eddie started freshman geometry, the boy was frustrated to learn that many of the Asian students in his class had already taken the course in summer school, Mr. Rowley recalls. That gave them a big leg up.

To many of Cupertino's Asians, some of the assumptions made by white parents -- that Asians are excessively competitive and single-minded -- play into stereotypes. Top schools in nearby, whiter Palo Alto, which also have very high test scores, also feature heavy course loads, long hours of homework and overly stressed students, says Denise Pope, director of Stressed Out Students, a Stanford University program that has worked with schools in both Palo Alto and Cupertino. But whites don't seem to be avoiding those institutions, or making the same negative generalizations, Asian families note, suggesting that it's not academic competition that makes white parents uncomfortable but academic competition with Asian-Americans.

Some of Cupertino's Asian residents say they don't blame white families for leaving. After all, many of the town's Asians are fretting about the same issues. While acknowledging that the term Asian embraces a wide diversity of countries, cultures and languages, they say there's some truth to the criticisms levied against new immigrant parents, particularly those from countries such as China and India, who often put a lot of academic pressure on their children.


Some parents and students say these various forces are creating an unhealthy cultural isolation in the schools. Monta Vista graduate Mark Seto says he wouldn't send his kids to his alma mater. "It was a sheltered little world that didn't bear a whole lot of resemblance to what the rest of the country is like," says Mr. Seto, a Chinese-American who recently graduated from Yale University. As a result, he says, "college wasn't an academic adjustment. It was a cultural adjustment."

Hung Wei, a Chinese-American living in Cupertino, has become an active campaigner in the community, encouraging Asian parents to be more aware of their children's emotional development. Ms. Wei, who is co-president of Monta Vista's PTA with Ms. Gatley, says her activism stems from the suicide of her daughter, Diana. Ms. Wei says life in Cupertino and at Monta Vista didn't prepare the young woman for life at New York University. Diana moved there in 2004 and jumped to her death from a Manhattan building two months later.

"We emphasize academics so much and protect our kids, I feel there's something lacking in our education," Ms. Wei says.

Cupertino schools are trying to address some of these issues. Monta Vista recently completed a series of seminars focused on such issues as helping parents communicate better with their kids, and Lynbrook last year revised its homework guidelines with the goal of eliminating excessive and unproductive assignments.

The moves haven't stemmed the flow of whites out of the schools. Four years ago, Lynn Rosener, a software consultant, transferred her elder son from Monta Vista to Homestead High, a Cupertino school with slightly lower test scores. At the new school, the white student body is declining at a slower rate than at Monta Vista and currently stands at 52% of the total. Friday-night football is a tradition, with big half-time shows and usually 1,000 people packing the stands. The school offers boys' volleyball, a sport at which Ms. Rosener's son was particularly talented. Monta Vista doesn't.

"It does help to have a lower Asian population," says Homestead PTA President Mary Anne Norling. "I don't think our parents are as uptight as if my kids went to Monta Vista."

Monday, November 14, 2005

The Weekend that Was

Well, Jeff rolled into town for a short weekend visit.

It was really fun.

I started off the weekend playing pickup football. After scoring a few TD's, I picked up Jeff at Dulles Airport. We ate lunch at the Fish Market, a wonderful outdoor market that sells fresh seafood at cut rate prices. I had my favorite: 2 softshell crab sandwiches. LB had the crabcake, while Jeff munched on red snapper sandwiches. We also split a heavy box of steamed cajun shrimp. Mmmm...

We visited the Smithsonian Natural History Museum. Certainly the best exhibit there was the Insect Zoo, a trippy collection of fun swarming insects.

After meeting Jeff's friend from Med School, we had some coffee in Adams Morgan, and got a dirt-cheap meal of falafels and gyros.

We talked until late about geo-political issues and farts. Good times.

Sunday started off with a visit to the pandas at the National Zoo. Kathy, Jonathan, Tritia, and Amy met up with Jeff, LB, and me. Between making fun of the skinny flamingos and extended bird imitations, I'm depressed that Jonathan and Kathy were only in town for such a short period of time.

We got some Zzzz's at my place, then went to church for the evening service.

Sunday for dinner, I cooked t-bone steaks and we watched Harry Potter in mandarin. (LB wanted the practice).

Yup, all in all... good times.

Come visit D.C.!

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Anyone Wanna Play?

For those of us in the basketball and bible study crowd, here's the next quirky sport: chess boxing.

Apparently, the sport is played by alternating the game of chess and the sport of boxing. There are six rounds of chess, each lasting four minutes, and five of boxing, each lasting two minutes. The rounds take place alternately, beginning and ending with chess, with one-minute intervals. You can win either by a knockout in the ring or checkmate on the board.

Yup, good times.

***

In other news, Priest Holmes just suffered his annual season-ending injury, meaning that my investment in Larry Johnson is *finally* going to pay off.

Yay for fantasy sports.

Friday, October 28, 2005

Outrageous

Farmers, Charities Join Forces
To Block Famine-Relief Revamp

Bush Administration Wants
To Purchase African Food;
Lobby Says Buy American
Proposal Is Stuck in Congress

By ROGER THUROW and SCOTT KILMAN
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
October 26, 2005; Page A1

American humanitarian groups, armed with food donated by the U.S. government, have fed millions of starving people around the world over the past half-century. So Bush administration officials figured the charities would support changes to America's food-aid program aimed at saving even more lives from famine.

Starting next year, the White House wants to spend one-quarter of its food-aid budget to buy overseas goods to feed starving foreigners. Currently, it's required to buy that produce from American farmers. The administration says the change will cut the cost of buying and shipping commodities and save 50,000 more lives a year.

But in a twist that reveals the peculiar alliances behind international aid, the charities are opposing the shift, in particular its size. That's because, for years, their humanitarian mission has been bound in an alliance with the American farmers, millers, port operators and shippers, who are paid by Uncle Sam to produce food and haul it to hunger zones overseas.

American agriculture prizes the income it earns from food aid and is a powerful constituency lobbying Congress to maintain the $1.2 billion program. Charities fear that slashing funds spent on U.S. commodities would erode the farm sector's interest in food aid. They doubt they could win as much congressional support for their efforts solely on the principle that fighting famines is important.

The aid groups also fear the transfer of funds is really a budget cut in disguise, shifting money away from their long-term agriculture development projects and toward emergency feeding programs.

Without the support of the charities or farmers, the proposal to overhaul food aid is languishing in Congress. Andrew S. Natsios, administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, which oversees the food-aid program, calls the opposition "morally indefensible." He asks: "If you can get more food for the money, why not do it? Just to protect the cartel?" The opposition from religious-based charities is particularly galling to the administration, which had assumed their support.

Michael R. Wiest, the chief operating officer of Catholic Relief Services says the budget fight is, "the largest crisis in the history of the food-aid program."

The "Food for Peace" program, as it is called, was signed into law by President Eisenhower in 1954. Since then, America's food-aid effort has branched out to work with 48 charities and foreign government organizations. Last year, the U.S. government donated 3.4 million metric tons of commodities to use as food aid in about 80 countries.

The program is governed by a bundle of regulations that favor U.S. agriculture. In all but the most exceptional cases, the U.S. government has to donate homegrown food for aid instead of sending cash or buying food overseas. In the 1950s, the idea was to help whittle down large U.S. crop surpluses generated by subsidizing American farmers.

In addition, 75% of food aid must be shipped on vessels owned by U.S. companies -- a sop to that industry, which charges some of the steepest prices on the high seas. Much of the food can't be shipped by bulk, adding to its cost. Because ports in many poor countries still unload ships by hand, the produce has to be put in 55- or 110-pound bags, which are also easier to distribute inland. The cost of freight for some American commodities is nearly as much as the cost of the commodities themselves.

While parts of Africa are routinely wracked by hunger, some countries often produce surpluses of wheat and corn. In 2003, for instance, the U.S. sent roughly 100,000 tons of American-grown grain to Uganda at a cost of $57 million to feed people in the country's north. At the same time, Ugandan farmers elsewhere were producing surplus crops their government couldn't afford to buy and transport. John Magnay, chief executive of Uganda Grain Traders Ltd., estimates that the U.S. could have purchased more than twice as much grain if it had bought it locally. He calculates that USAID spent $447 per ton for U.S. corn delivered to his country. The cost for Ugandan corn: $180 per ton.

This was the case Mr. Natsios brought to the food-aid community's annual convention in Kansas City, Mo., where grain-marketing executives in suits mingle with relief workers in blue jeans and T-shirts, as processors of everything from potatoes to buckwheat pitch their famine-fighting attributes. This May, nearly 800 people attended. An ocean-shipping firm organized a golf outing while a railroad helped to provide breakfast.

Experience With Hunger

Mr. Natsios, 56 years old, grew up listening to stories of his family's experience with hunger in Greece during World War II. A retired lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves, he started public life in 1975 as a Republican state legislator in Massachusetts, where he served alongside Andrew H. Card, now President Bush's chief of staff. He served in the administration of George H.W. Bush at USAID, and then spent much of the Clinton administration as a vice president of World Vision, a nondenominational Christian group. He took the reins of USAID in 2001.

In a combative speech, Mr. Natsios laid out the administration's proposal to take $300 million from the $1.2 billion Food for Peace program and use it to buy food as close as possible to countries stricken by famine.

Mr. Natsios pressed his plan by suggesting how it could have saved lives in Ethiopia during its 2003 famine. A bumper wheat harvest the previous year depressed local prices so sharply that farmers were discouraged from planting. When drought hit in 2003, production was further slashed and a famine was born. Mr. Natsios said the U.S. should have bought Ethiopian wheat in 2002 to use as food relief. Such a move also would have stabilized prices and supported the local farm economy.

Instead, in 2003, the U.S. rushed in $500 million of U.S. food to feed 13 million starving Ethiopians. The American food traveled on roads that ran right past local warehouses filled with the 2002 Ethiopian harvest.

Mr. Natsios suggested that humanitarian groups didn't need to align themselves with the farm lobby. "The fact that U.S. farmers and shippers are able to benefit from the Food for Peace program is an important, but secondary benefit," he said. "The primary objective is to save lives."

The response to the speech was "hostile," the USAID chief recalls. Says Robert Zachritz, senior policy adviser at World Vision, which also distributes U.S. food aid: "He didn't make friends."

Relief officials at the conference wore white buttons displaying a simple black "2." That's two as in $2 billion -- the food-aid funding they're seeking in the 2006 federal budget. They were in no mood for talk of shifting money from the food-aid budget at a time when Washington is scouring its ledgers for programs to cut.

Most aid organizations acknowledge that buying food locally could help feed more people in times of emergency. But they're only willing to back Mr. Natsios's proposal if it's funded by additional spending, rather than a cut in the funds spent on U.S. commodities. To preserve funding for the food-aid program, the charities believe they must take into account the financial interests of farmers at home.

"These are tough choices and we agonize over them," says Peter D. Bell, president and chief executive officer of Care USA, a relief group based in Atlanta. "You could come out further behind if you lose political support." While the group says it supports the local-purchase concept, it doesn't want to see cuts in Food for Peace's budget for long-term development projects.

Much of the food donated under Food for Peace is used by the relief organizations to pay poor villagers for work on agriculture improvement projects -- such as digging irrigation ditches and building roads -- or for long-term efforts such as school-feeding programs. The aid groups also sometimes sell the donated commodities to finance these projects.

USAID officials have already cannibalized such projects to muster food aid in response to hunger crises in Africa. "We're being asked to endorse a further evisceration of the development programs," says Mr. Wiest, who ran many of those projects during his two decades in Africa for Catholic Relief.

Local purchase would also hit the charities themselves. Distributing U.S. wheat, corn and beans is an important operation of their activities abroad. For Catholic Relief, donations of commodities and transport costs, which come largely from the U.S. government, totaled $281 million, or just over 50% of its fiscal 2004 budget.

Mr. Wiest denies that Catholic Relief's opposition is in defense of its own well-being. Every day, he passes a plaque in the charity's Baltimore headquarters featuring the Gospel of St. Matthew: "For I was hungry and you gave me food. I was thirsty and you gave me drink." He says: "I can say without blinking that our opposition to that proposal has nothing to do with an impact on our bottom line."

Mr. Natsios says he had planned to approach legislators with this line: "The humanitarian people need this to save lives and fight famine." Instead, his proposal is mired in Congress. Neither the House nor Senate agriculture committees have included local purchase money in their appropriations bills. The Bush administration hopes to insert the concept into the budget when the chambers reconcile their bills.

Complicated Relationship

President Bush has a complicated relationship with America's farmers. He signed the 2002 farm bill, which sweetened federal farming handouts, but now he's trying to rein in those programs to shrink the budget deficit and smooth negotiations at the World Trade Organization. Developing countries heavily dependent on agriculture complain that U.S. farm subsidies spur overproduction that depresses world prices.


Even before the USAID proposal circulated earlier this year, Washington was under pressure to revamp the food-aid program. European Union nations say the U.S. uses it to dump surpluses and to get recipients hooked on the taste of U.S.-grown food. Mr. Natsios dismisses both accusations. The Europeans send cash instead of commodities.

But farm programs, including the food-aid budget, are under the control of Congress's agriculture committees. Their main goal is promoting U.S. farming interests.

Mr. Natsios's plan "would deprive the U.S. agricultural community of their sense of pride and compassion," testified John Lestingi, vice president of Rice Co., a Roseville, Calif., exporter, during a House hearing in June.

"It is our right to provide aid in the form of food instead of cash," insisted Jim Madich, vice president of Horizon Milling. Horizon is a joint venture of Minneapolis commodity-processing giant Cargill Inc. and CHS Inc., St. Paul, Minn., a big agricultural cooperative. Cargill and its venture have sold $1.09 billion of grain to the U.S. government for use in foreign food-aid programs since 1995, according to figures released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in response to a request filed by The Wall Street Journal under the Freedom of Information Act.

Cargill disputes that figure but wouldn't provide its own tally.

Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, warns that buying food aid overseas would erode congressional support for famine-fighting programs. "It must come from American farmers," says the Virginia Republican, so "it will circulate through the American economy."

Out in that economy, opposition to the plan is solid. "If you start spending the food-aid money overseas, you start losing jobs here," says Dwayne Jordan, who fills bags with U.S.-grown grain at the Port of Lake Charles, La., which handles upward of 400,000 tons of food aid each year.

After his appearance in Kansas City, Mr. Natsios summoned leaders of the aid agencies to his Washington office for a two-hour meeting. Other conversations followed, some of which deteriorated into shouting matches, according to participants.

A coalition of humanitarian groups tried to cobble together a compromise that they presented to USAID and Congress: a pilot program for local purchasing that would set aside 5% of the food-aid budget, instead of USAID's proposed 25%. That was too little for Mr. Natsios and too much for agricultural business interests.

As the spat intensified, some charity officials began to question whether the Natsios plan was actually intended to lessen criticism of U.S. farm subsidies and food aid at the WTO. Others believe it's a backdoor attempt to cut the food-aid budget; cash earmarked for spending abroad is easier to slash than cash to buy U.S. commodities.

"The perception was, is this a camel's nose under the tent that could destroy Food for Peace?" says World Vision's Mr. Zachritz.

Mr. Natsios says these suspicions are unfounded. "Humanitarian aid does a significant job," he says, "but they get used to doing it one way."

Monday, October 24, 2005

Uncommercial

I found this CNN article on Bill Watterson, the creator of Calvin and Hobbes.

I remember cracking up reading the brilliant antics of Calvin and his stuffed bear. The comic always single-handedly made playing in the snow look tremendously fun.

The article focuses on how Mr. Watterson never took much commercial advantage of Calvin and Hobbes. He never licensed any products, isn't available for interviews, and despises the commercialization of his work (it "violates the spirit" of the strip.)

Good for you, Mr. Watterson.

===

In related news, I've become a Google AdWords advertiser. Please click on the ads at the top of my BLOG so I can make some ch-ching!

Friday, October 21, 2005

Clever

21 Oct 2005 The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5- year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English". In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy.

The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil a l be speking German like zey vunted in ze forst plas.

Sunday, October 16, 2005

Yup, that's my fantasy football life

I'm playing Mike Cho this week, and my unofficial count, we're basically even going into the Sunday night game. Jake Delhomme and Antowain Smith (Antowain Smith!) each had two touchdowns for Mike. Donte Stallworth scored once, Thomas Jones scored twice, and my defense scored once for me.

That means my game against Mike comes down to 3 players. I have Matt Hasselbeck playing the sad sack defnese of the Texans tonight. I played Hasselbeck instead of Marc Bulger because Hasselbeck plays one of the worst defenses in the NFL - the Texans - while Bulger plays one of the best, the surprising Indianapolis Colts.

On the other hand, Mike has two players left, the kicker for the Seahawks, and Edgerrin James.

To summarize, if Hasselbeck outscores the Seahawks kicker and Edgerrin James combined, I win. Otherwise, it'll be months of trashtalking from my newly engaged friend in St. Louis. Not good times.

  • It's 8:35 EST, time for kickoff.
  • 8:50 - The Seahawks immediately drive into Houston territory and have made it to the Houston 30. Uh oh, 4th down and 1. That means Mike's kicker could kick a 47-yard field goal and get 4 early points on me. Yay, Mike Holmgren! Go for the first down! And... he makes it on 4th down. The drive results in a Shaun Alexander touchdown. 7-0 Seahawks.
  • 9:08 - The Seahawks are driving down the field again. Needless to say, Shaun Alexander scores again. Although the Hawks are now up 14-0 at the end of the first quarter, my man Hasselbeck has just 60 yards - 1.5 fantasy points.
  • 9:34 - Finally! Hasselbeck hooks up with Joe Jurevicius for a 3 yard touchdown. 6 points... ch-ching!
  • 9:45 - So sad. The Seahawks get the ball back with 45 seconds left in the first half. Deep pass down the field, right? Hasselbeck tries to throw through the 6'1", 237 pound linebacker who's dropped back into zone coverage. Interception. -2 points. I will now light my hair on fire.
  • 9:58 - Halftime. I gotta say, my man Hasselbeck has that premature balding thing down pat. Combined with his baby face, he looks like he belongs on the couch next to me, watching the game.
  • 10:35 - Seahawks are driving, again. Hasselbeck runs 24 yards, 2.2 points.
  • 10:38 - Ball on the 10 yard line. Please, pass it in! Pass it in! Mmmm... Laura is making me a sandwich. Please, Hasselbeck, get a touchdown! 1st and goal, Hasselbeck passes to Alexander! Stuffed at the one! Needless to say, on the next play, it's an Alexander run, and he makes it into the endzone standing up. Would it have been so hard to do that on that last pass from Hasselbeck? C'mon Alexander, let's show some consideration, here.
  • 10:45 - Domanick Davis just ran down the sideline with a Carr pass and scored a touchdown. That makes it 27-10. Hopefully, that will prevent the Seahawks from shutting down the passing game.
  • 11:04 - 2nd and goal from the 24. Passing down? I'm hopeful that this will force them to pass. But no, it's a handoff! Alexander runs right through every Texans defender to score again! Hasselbeck is kind of like me playing basketball - even when he wins, he never gets to score.
  • 11:07 - I realize that I'm watching the game - in its entirety - even though I don't like either team. Whoever invented fantasy football is more evil than Juan Escobar, the kingpin of crack.
  • 11:35 - The final insult. Alexander is out. The Seahawks have scored again. Is Hasselbeck involved? No. The backup running back punches it in.

Well, the game's over, and in not scoring, Hasselbeck has pretty much done in my fantasy team. If Edgerrin James scores a TD tomorrow, I can pretty much look forward to a stream of e-mails from Mike toasting my defeat at his hands.

Sigh. At least my real life is good.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

On MLB

A few random thoughts on the baseball playoffs thus far:

  • I get such a warm gush of feeling at the thought of the Yankees spending another cold winter without a championship. I tell you: there is no pleasure like rubbing the failures of their tired, sorry club in the face of a Yankees fan. Aaaaahhh... Monday's game was sweet. (By the way, read Andrew's great post on what the Yankees should do in the offseason.)
  • Boston, we hardly knew ye.
  • How can you not cheer for the Astros now? Great pitching, fun players. This year's NLCS should be good.
  • I'm hoping for a World Series between the White Sox and the Astros. Realistically, though, the Cardinals and Angels will roll in.

Friday, October 07, 2005

On Stanford Sports

This post has been brewing in my head for a while following Stanford's disastrous loss to UC Davis last month.

UC Davis!

I didn't even know they had a football team!

My buddy RKao went to UC Davis. He said that their favorite pasttime is cow tipping. (I did *not* make this up.)

Why is Stanford upset so often?

The origins as to Stanford's record for upsets starts with its own success. Stanford is, legitimately, a sports powerhouse that's won 11 consecutive Sears Cups / Sports Academy Director's Cups, awarded to the "best overall collegiate athletics program" in the country. Stanford has a well-deserved good sports name recognition because we field good teams in virtually every sport, year after year.

But Stanford's college sports dominance is often not in big money, big publicity sports. The NACDA press release above says that Stanford won national championships in women's volleyball and women's tennis, and placed runner up in men's water polo and men's swimming. Further, Stanford teams placed in the top ten in women's cross country (5th), women's basketball (5th), women's swimming (5th), women's outdoor track and field (5th), men's cross country (6th), men's gymnastics (7th), men's indoor track and field (7th) and softball (9th).

None of these sports are minor, but none feed into the top professional leagues: MLB, the NFL, the NBA, and (to a lesser extent) the NHL.

Since these are the sports that people care more about, as evidenced by the TV positioning of college football (every Saturday), basketball (the NCAA tournament), and to a lesser extent, baseball (the College World Series), Stanford's reputation for powerful athletics is continually disappointed when faced with the scrutiny of the most public sports.

I have a second theory, but one that I can't substantiate at all. Stanford's high athletic standards give it athletes that are more cerebral, but less athletic. Witness basketball: we feature cerebral players that just aren't the best athletes.

The biggest stars that have played for us in recent years include Chris Hernandez, Josh Childress, Casey Jacobsen, and the Collins twins. All of these players are very good in their own right, but you can find concrete physical weaknesses in each of their makeups. Compare these guys to the super athletes that Arizona has recruited: Andre Iguodala, Salim Stoudamire, Channing Frye, and Mike Bibby.

So we have good athletes who are smart enough and well-coached enough to have great execution. And, over the course of a regular season, good athletes with great execution can do very well (I'm excepting Stanford football from this, which, through the steady stream of coaching changes, seems to have neither good athletes nor great execution). Other teams depending on their athleticism can get worn down over the course of a game and especially over the course of a season, but great execution shows up game after game. Analysts and fans get deceived into rating Stanford's team highly because of the deceptively good records generated by very good execution.

This strategy works; I'm not criticizing it given Stanford's limitations on recruiting. But I'm saying that this strategy is enough to get into the playoffs, but that there's no way that these teams can go deep into them.

Eventually, they run into teams with superior athletes, who, even coached less well, can run them off the field/court. It takes a lot of superior execution to win against super athleticism. That's the classic team that has beaten Stanford's overrated teams. Or, deep in the playoffs, you eventually meet teams that have superior athletes *and* superior execution. And no team has any chance against a group of players who is more athletic and has better execution.

So that's Stanford sports. Great reputation. Good players. Great execution. Good enough to become the favorite. Not good enough to avoid the stream of embarassing upsets.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

Pic



"Why yes, I am drunk. Why do you ask?"

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Not Again

Thursday, September 15, 2005

I knew it

I always knew eating breakfast was good for you.

An excerpt from a WSJ article:

Eat Breakfast, Stay Thin
Missing a meal could actually make you fatter, according to a new study. For 10 years, the Maryland Medical Research Institute kept track of the eating habits of some 2,400 girls and found that those who ate breakfast had a lower body-mass index than those who didn't. Cereal-eaters stayed especially thin, according to the study, which began tracking the girls when they were 9 years old and stopped when they were 19. The high-fiber and low-fat content of many cereals and breakfast foods might have helped girls stay thin, the researchers said. Other experts told the AP that eating breakfast might also have made the girls less inclined to eat big lunches and dinners and more inclined to have controlled, structured eating habits. Skeptics take note: the study was funded partly by the National Institutes of Health and partly by cereal-maker General Mills. "You can't walk away saying, I'm going to eat cereal and lose weight," Melinda Johnson, a dietitian with the Arizona state health department, told the AP. But she added that the study's results were consistent with those of other studies and said, "Eating breakfast is the right thing to do."

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

A Few Ways to Save Gas Money

With gas prices here averaging $3.30 a gallon, everyone could use a few tips to save a little money on gas.

  • Improve your fuel efficiency: Here's a very helpful government website about getting better gas mileage. One of the best features on the site is a little chart showing how the speed you drive affects your gas mileage. (55 mph is the most fuel-efficient speed.) It gives other helpful, non-obvious tips, including taking extra weight out of your car, and using overdrive gears to slow the engine speed down.

  • Go to Costco gas stations: The Costco gas station at the warehouse nearest my house is an amazing 10 cents per gallon cheaper. Use Costco.com's warehouse locator to find a Costco gas station near your house.

  • Consider the Chase PerfectCard: Props to Cory and Jason for recommending the Chase PerfectCard. You get 1% cash back on all purchases, but 3% cash back on all purchases at gas stations. (I've found that the card also gives 3% back at other, gas station-like stores, like 7-eleven). At $3.30 per gallon, this is a savings of about 10 cents a gallon. Best of all, the rebate amount is just credited to your next statement. This avoids hassles like paperwork or having to worry about shopping for the right reward, like other credit card rewards programs.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

The Kanye West Moment

I just watched this video clip about 10 times.

Kanye West is on NBC with Mike Myers talking about hurricane relief, when he bursts in with a dead-faced "George Bush doesn't care about black people." Myers, after a moment of stunned, gaping disbelief, tries to continue what he's saying, but the network immediately cuts away.

Watch it here.

Monday, September 05, 2005

A Piece of Asian American History

I sat in on my flight from San Francisco to Beijing next to an elderly Asian couple. I smiled blithely at them, assuming that they were on their way home and spoke poor English. My first note of surprise came when the flight attendant asked them for their drink preferences; their looks of confusion indicated that they didn't speak Mandarin at all.

About halfway through the flight, I struck up a conversation and learned the reason for their lack of Mandarin language. The man spoke only Cantonese; the woman was not Chinese but Japanese.

As our conversation went on, I learned that she'd been placed with all the other Japanese Americans into an internment camps during World War II.

Although she'd been only a baby when her family was first sent to a concentration camp in Arkansas, she remembered parts of it distinctly. She remembered how everything was done in black and white; tar paper was used in abundance.

She described for me the breakdown in families that occurred in concentration camps. Since there wasn't really much common space in each home, families didn't share life together. Instead, boys of a similar age, and girls of a similar age would hang out together all day. They'd use their homes only for sleeping.

Finally, my airplane neighbor described elements of the camp coming straight out of the book, Snow Falling on Cedars. Their German neighbor took care of the family farm while the family was away. When her family had left, a caucasian boy was in love with her older sister, and would write constantly.

I appreciated sitting next to an Asian couple who had experienced a piece of Asian American history. Who knows what scenes of America we'll live through?

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

On Google

For anybody using a computer, Google products have become an essential part of the world wide web. The Google search engine has become an invaluable tool of gathering information; for most, it's the first and only place they search when they need facts. Its Gmail service is the de facto web mail for savvy Internet users. The Google brand name generates images of clean interfaces, well-designed products, and intelligent features.

For those following high-tech business, the Google brand name is bringing something new: fear. Google has steamed into a number of new markets, from comparison shopping (An aside: I don't find that Froogle works well at all.) to giving driving directions (very useful, though I wish they had the ability to remember addresses I've already entered) to the newly introduced instant messaging service (I haven't tried this yet.)

Although I could write an entire blog post describing the benefits and areas of improvement for each of these services, I trust that readers could easily do this themselves.

Instead, I've reserved this blog for an area of speculation that struck me while reading about Google in the newspaper.

Could Google be developing a PC operating system?

In 2000, at the height of the tech boom, people envisioned "thin-client" computing as the next step in the Internet. Pundits thought that computers would just be monitors with Internet connections. All the processing would occur virtually instantly on the server side. The thin-client monitor would then just see the result.

The result isn't an operating system in the sense that Microsoft Windows is (Windows is basically a platform for other software to run). But why would you need an operating system if you could do everything that you needed to do without one?

Here's my case for why the direction they're heading could lead to a challenge for Microsoft.

1) Their current suite of software has accomplished many of the same functions as an operating system.

Google has enough functionality in its various web applications to duplicate many of the functions currently accomplished by an operating system. For example, they already have software that does desktop search and file organization. The Gmail service acts as an e-mail client and is already used by many as a place to store files. Other functions, like picture editing and text-editing - they can all be taken care of by Google-related products.

I'll admit that there are many operating system-based pieces of software that would be very difficult - maybe impossible - to run without an operating system. For example, modern video games require processing power that stretches the limits of each generation of Intel processors; you can forget about running these purely online. Similarly, the utterly pervasive Microsoft Excel would be almost impossible to work with from a web-based platform.

So maybe Google couldn't replace all the things you need Windows for without a serious partnership with a desktop-based operating system (like Linux). Still, it might come close.

2) They've raised a massive warchest of money, and are ambitious (narcisstic?) enough to try.

Warning: Conspiracy theory ahead!

Google is issuing 14.2 million shares, valued at more than $4 billion. This, combined with their $3 billion in cash already marked on their balance sheet, means that they have a LOT of money to play with.

Combine this with the oddball and strangely combative tendencies of Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and you see why there are a lot of conspiracy theorists.

Essentially, this part of the argument goes: Google has a lot of money. They have a history of entering big markets.

My theory adds: why not operating systems?

Google could make a play into the biggest and most secure technology market of the past 20 years. Make money, challenge Microsoft, and do something quirky - all at the same time.

Monday, August 15, 2005

Silver Lining

Yup, the weather in D.C. has been sucky. Yes, you have to walk everywhere. But then again...

Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of it as a final resting place for those who died here that the nation might live. This we may, in all propriety do. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have hallowed it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here.

It is rather for us the living, we here be dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth.


Yup, this is a good reason for being here.

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Netflix List

Here's what's on my Netflix list:

At Home
1) The Road Home

2) West Wing Season 4, Disc 1

3) The Aviator

In the Queue

1) Enemy at the Gates
2) Matchstick Men
3) Infernal Affairs
4) Constantine
5) Sin City
6) Assault on Precinct 13
7) The Cooler

Anyone have any recommendations for DVDs to watch?

Friday, August 12, 2005

Everyone's Stopped Blogging

I was chatting with CChen, who pointed out that the blogging phenomenon seems to have peaked, and is now declining. I couldn't agree more. It seems like the vast majority of my friends have stopped updating their blogs, or are updating so infrequently that it's just as if they've stopped.

The reason?

I think people have just lost interesting things to say.

This suggests to me that it's very difficult to be a syndicated news columnist. Imagine having to try to think of interesting, creative things to say three times a week for 5, 10, or 20 years?

Or a syndicated cartoonist? Stamping out comics 7 days a week for a decade?

It gives me a new appreciation for professional writers.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

In the Elevator

Have you ever noticed that when people ride the elevator, they always look at the floor numbers? Whether the floor number is a digital display, or a bunch of white circles with numbers in them, people just naturally focus on them, all the way from where they get on to where they get off.

Naturally, I have theories to this:

1) People like to look at motion. This is that little A.ttention D.eficit D.isorder in all of us. We need to look at what's happening.

2) People don't like to stare at each other. For some reason, in modern society, it's considered rude to stare, even though people ogle each other privately all the time.

3) Or the darkest possibility: People are just barely tolerating the suffocating, claustrophobic closeness of the elevator. And they stare at the numbers to monitor progress, just waiting to tear outside.

Monday, September 20, 2004

Test